Skip to main content


Dr. Charles Nelson Winslow and a couple "catty" subjects

Let's face it: cats have a reputation for being, well... catty. But, is this reputation based in fact? Or, do cats have the capacity to get along?

In the 1940s, Charles Nelson Winslow looked to answer this question in a unique way — by pitting cats against each other in a game of wits. He wanted to know whether the competition would make them more aggressive, or if cats would betray their reputation and err on the side of kindness. The experiment was performed at Brooklyn College and published in the Journal of Comparative Psychology in October 1944.

Dr. Winslow was incredibly fortunate to have his experimental method documented with stunning photographs. The photographs, taken by Nina Leen, appeared in a December 1941 issue of LIFE magazine. Here, they are presented again, giving us the opportunity to revisit Dr. Winslow’s experiment in all its categorical glory.

One of Dr. Winslow's subjects

You may be wondering why Dr. Winslow wanted to study the behavior of cats. In the 1940s, much like today, most psychologists working with animal subjects preferred rats or mice. It was unusual to see cats in psychological research, and this was one of the reasons Dr. Winslow wanted to study them. He believed that in order to understand how the social behavior of humans has evolved, you have to investigate the social behavior of animals "at as many different levels as possible." He suggested that cats represent an important "intermediary" species helping bridge the gap between rodents and apes. However, Dr. Winslow noted that because scientists focus on other species "very little is known about the social behavior of cats beyond the anecdotal accounts which appear in popular books and magazines."

One of Dr. Winslow's cats learns to escape the puzzle box.

After unlatching the door, the cat exits the box and approaches the food.
Truth is, before the widespread use of rodents, cats had a critical place in the study of behavior. In the 1890s, Edward Thorndike famously used cats in his research on the "law of effect." His method involved putting cats in a puzzle box and measuring how long it took them to get out. In order to escape the box, the cat had to press levers and buttons which eventually opened a door leading to escape. Dr. Winslow decided to employ a similar method for his cats. His puzzle box required the cat to turn a lever, which opened a door and led the cat to food outside the box. Dr. Winslow trained the cats individually to ensure they all knew how to escape the box before having them compete with each other.

Dr. Winslow puts food between the two puzzle boxes

For the competition part of the experiment, Dr. Winslow used two identical puzzle boxes and loaded up each one with a cat. He then placed a lump of cat food between the two boxes. When the experimenter called "ready," the cats immediately went to work trying to unlatch the door. Either the cats would liberate themselves at the same time or one would win by releasing itself from the box before the other. However, even in cases where one cat got to the food first, the second cat arrived soon after. This resulted in a confrontation of sorts.

Two cats fighting over food

Two cats sharing food

When cats made physical contact, they showed a range of different behaviors. Dr. Winslow wrote that, "Although struggles for the small piece of food occurred in a large proportion of the trials, the number of times that the competitors shared the food without showing overt hostility were many." He found that some cats were "friendly" while others were "cocky" and "aggressive." The latter cats would growl and scratch in order to ward off their opponent. A scuffle would sometimes ensue, but the fights were brief, and Dr. Winslow reported no injuries. It was more common for one cat to back down, or for the two cats to push each other back and forth with their heads as they each struggled for a bite of food. (It should be noted that all cats were fed each day after testing.)

Dr. Winslow failed to make a verdict about whether cats are generally more friendly or aggressive toward one another. His results showed that pushing and fighting occurred just as often as sharing. But, failure to make a general statement about cats led Dr. Winslow to an interesting conclusion.

Dr. Winslow's cats

Dr. Winslow made it clear that not all cats were alike. Some had a friendly disposition while others were more aggressive — in other words, the cats had different personalities. At the time, this was a controversial position to take. Psychologists recognized that people have a natural tendency to misperceive human traits in nonhuman animals, and for this reason they were reluctant to accept that animals had personalities. Although the tendency to anthropomorphize was a valid concern — and it remains one today — Dr. Winslow argued that different personalities are nevertheless quite evident in animals, and that psychologists can and should pursue the topic with an open mind.

Two cats working together for food in a "cooperative pulling" experiment

A kitten looks for food in a maze

Dr. Winslow performed several other studies on the behavior of cats. In one study, he had cats race down a runway. In another, he put cats in a "cooperative pulling paradigm" where they had to work together to obtain food. Like the puzzle box experiment, these studies revealed differences in personality. Dr. Winslow reported that some cats were "altruistic," allowing their opponents to eat all the food, while others were more selfish and fought to keep the food for themselves. LIFE magazine also included a few photographs of a kitten searching for food in a maze. The details of this study remain unknown; the findings, to my knowledge, have never been published.

In the end, Dr. Winslow's cat experiments showed that some of the things that make us human, like altruism, aggression, and personality, were present in our feline ancestors before people came into existence. Therefore, it could be argued that instead of cats sometimes acting like people, really the opposite is true — sometimes people act like cats.

Read Dr. Winslow's original article on the puzzle box experiment here.

The LIFE magazine article can be found here.

Popular posts from this blog


In 1912, Mazie Fitzroy of St. Louis, Missouri, sat down to draw a picture of her nephew, when she suddenly lost control of her hand. It seemed the hand had a mind of its own and was drawing a picture without her direction. Being curious, she didn't resist and let the hand finish its work. The end result was a face that looked nothing like her nephew, nor like anyone she had ever met.

This was the first of many "automatic" drawings by Fitzroy — always faces, and never anyone she knew. Dr. Charles Cory, professor at Washington University, described the case in an article published in The Journal of Abnormal Psychology in February 1920. Dr. Cory believed Fitzroy's automatic drawings originated from her unconscious mind. To others, the mysterious drawings were evidence of psychic phenomena.
Charles Edward Cory was born in the small village of Thornburg, Iowa, on December 6, 1878. A remarkable student of philosophy and theology, he earned his Ph.D. at Ya…


On August 28, 1993, the Mighty Morphin Power Rangers premiered and made instant fans of children across the globe. Based on the Japanese television series Super Sentai, the Power Rangers featured a colorful team of high-kicking, karate-chopping teenagers endowed with special powers and the ability to summon massive robots or, "zords", to protect the world from evil. The show was a profound success and launched a mega-franchise of movies, toys, and television spin-offs that continue to capture the hearts of children to this day.

Given how super popular the original Power Rangers series was, it only seemed natural that someone would develop a therapy based on the gang of somersaulting, zord-beckoning heroes. And, in the mid-90s, Dr. Avi Rose, a clinical psychologist from the University of Toronto, did just that. He saw great potential in the themes, characters, and morality plays depicted in the show and established a new therapy using Power Rangers story arcs as metaphors for …


In the 1930s, Dr. Loyd W. Rowland hypnotized several people and convinced them to touch an angry rattlesnake. In another experiment, he had them throw sulphuric acid in his face. His findings warned of the dangers of hypnosis — that it could be used to persuade normal people into hurting themselves and others.

Hugh Davis, the curator of a local zoo, was the snake handler for the study.
The two experiments, which took place at the University of Tulsa, Oklahoma, appeared in the Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology in January 1939. The report drew criticism and kicked off a controversial series of experiments testing the limits of what a person can and cannot be made to do under hypnosis.

THE RATTLESNAKE EXPERIMENT Dr. Rowland borrowed a diamondback rattlesnake from a nearby zoo and placed it in a box with the help of Hugh Davis, a professional handler (learn more about Hugh Davis's extraordinary life here).

Dr. Rowland kept the box in a hot room for three days until the snake “becam…